Protect your AI applications and agents from attacks, fakes, unauthorized access, and malicious data inputs.
Control your GenAI applications and agents and assure their alignment with their business purpose.
Proactively test GenAI models, agents, and applications before attackers or users do
The only real-time multi-language multimodality technology to ensure your brand safety and alignment with your GenAI applications.
Ensure your app is compliant with changing regulations around the world across industries.
Proactively identify vulnerabilities through red teaming to produce safe, secure, and reliable models.
Detect and prevent malicious prompts, misuse, and data leaks to ensure your conversational AI remains safe, compliant, and trustworthy.
Protect critical AI-powered applications from adversarial attacks, unauthorized access, and model exploitation across environments.
Provide enterprise-wide AI security and governance, enabling teams to innovate safely while meeting internal risk standards.
Safeguard user-facing AI products by blocking harmful content, preserving brand reputation, and maintaining policy compliance.
Secure autonomous agents against malicious instructions, data exfiltration, and regulatory violations across industries.
Ensure hosted AI services are protected from emerging threats, maintaining secure, reliable, and trusted deployments.
Threat actors evolve. So should your defenses.
Ahead of Moldovaโs 2025 elections, shadow news outlets are spreading disinformation targeting the diaspora.
The upcoming Moldovan parliamentary elections are more than a local event; they sit at the crossroads of global influence. Moldova is wedged between Romania (an EU and NATO member) and Ukraine, making it a key battleground in the ongoing struggle between Russia and the West.
For many voters, the choice is stark: continued European integration or a pivot back toward Russia. Unsurprisingly, Moscow has a vested interest in shaping the outcome, with disinformation and covert influence campaigns already in play.
The Moldovan diaspora, Moldovans living abroad, represents nearly a third of the countryโs population, making it a powerful electoral force that is increasingly being targeted by foreign-led covert influence. The diaspora played a key role in the 2024 presidential election, especially following the referendum paving the way for EU membership.
This makes them a prime target for influence operations. Shadow โnewsโ brands, often appearing grassroots and local, are increasingly used to manipulate diaspora perceptions. While these outlets look independent, investigations reveal hidden ownership, redacted registration, and connections to known foreign influence networks.
ActiveFence SMAEs have identified several new online networks targeting Moldovan voters. These networks, undocumented in standard OSINT feeds, mimic independent local journalism but are characterized by a lack of transparency: redacted registration details, hidden ownership, and no visible editorial staff, and exhibit overlapping technical fingerprints.ย
For example, one of the investigated entities directed users to a domain which, in turn redirected them to ziar[.]com, which is openly linked to a Franceโbased company reportedly involved in previous influence operations. The domain further shares a single analytics identifier with at least 17 other international domains, many operating as news aggregators.ย
In a separate Moldova-focused network, the core domain presence is part of a cluster of โ25 interconnected domains that previously shared Russian IP/name servers and common analytics identifiers, consistent with umbrella control across differently branded outlets.
The disinformation playbook is sophisticated. Narratives are tailored depending on where Moldovans live:
False claims include accusations of surplus ballots for overseas polling stations, neglect of diaspora interests, or even fabricated images of anti-diaspora graffiti in European cities
These networks donโt just push stories once; they recycle them across multiple outlets to create the illusion of widespread consensus. This technique, known as narrative laundering, ensures that even if one site gets shut down, others remain active to keep the message alive. The content can then be shared across social media, messaging services, and may also influence responses given by LLM chatbots to election-related queries.
What This Means for Defenders
For those monitoring information integrity, focusing on a single domain or social media account wonโt cut it. The real power lies in mapping connections:
By taking a networked approach, defenders can move from chasing isolated cases to disrupting entire influence operations
As Moldova heads toward a consequential vote, targeting of the diaspora is only expected to intensify. The stakes are clear: ensuring authentic diaspora engagement is vital to preserving informed democratic choice.
Disinformation campaigns like these donโt stay confined to Moldova, theyโre part of a global trend of information warfare targeting diasporas, elections, and brands.
ActiveFenceโs Threat Intelligence teams uncover covert networks, track emerging narratives, using advanced techniques like web-infrastructure clustering (registrant history, shared analytics identifiers, mirror mapping) combined with multilingual crawling of hard-to-find sources. Our team surfaces hidden risks before they hit mainstream attention.ย
Want to understand how covert operations might be targeting your community, customers, or industry? ย Talk to our experts today and get actionable intelligence to stay ahead of evolving threats.
Get ahead of coordinated disinformation.
ActiveFence assesses the false narratives that have spread across German social media during the country's 2021 federal elections.
The EU has formally sanctioned key players behind Russiaโs coordinated disinformation ecosystem. These campaigns, long monitored by ActiveFence, reveal a complex strategy built on narrative laundering, infrastructure resilience, and long-term influence.
AI-generated misinformation is spreading faster than ever. How can companies handle this threat during world events like the 2024 Paris Olympics?