Real-time visibility, safety, and security for your GenAI-powered agents and applications
Proactively test GenAI models, agents, and applications before attackers or users do
Deploy generative AI applications and agents in a safe, secure, and scalable way with guardrails.
Proactively identify vulnerabilities through red teaming to produce safe, secure, and reliable models.
Get the full 5-Principle Handbook for Deploying Safe AI Companions
AI companions are elevating entertainment experiences, but without safety embedded in their character and context, the risks, especially for younger users, are high. This op-ed outlines a practical framework for designing AI companions you can trust.
AI companions are no longer niche use cases. They are rapidly transforming how audiences interact with stories, characters, and immersive digital worlds. However, this innovation introduces significant safety challenges. Unlike traditional assistants, AI-driven characters embedded in gaming and entertainment contexts operate within emotionally charged, highly dynamic scenarios, blurring lines between fiction and reality. They speak in character and respond in real time, interacting directly with players and fans, many of whom are underage.
Addressing safety in these scenarios requires enterprises to navigate ethical, technical, and experiential complexities simultaneously.
Recent research highlights the scale and immediacy of this issue. A study by Common Sense Media and Stanford University found that social AI companions pose risks to teens and children, including encouraging harmful behaviors and providing inappropriate content. Media outlets have also documented incidents where AI companions engaged in inappropriate interactions with young users, triggering reputational and regulatory concerns.
That said, building trustworthy AI companions for all audiences is possible—if done right. This means incorporating AI safety-by-design principles from the beginning of the project, tailored to the specific context in which the AI will operate. These principles must be proactive, contextual, and intentionally crafted for narrative-rich environments where realism and emotional engagement are central to the experience.
Drawing from ActiveFence’s extensive collaboration with leading gaming enterprises, we outline a clear, actionable framework for how to build safe AI companions.
The first decision is not about architecture. It is about character. Every AI companion needs a clearly defined persona, including tone, emotional range, and behavioral limits, before any technical development begins.
These narrative decisions directly impact safety. A childlike personality introduces different risks than a stoic one. Companions in war games or horror scenarios may interact with violent or taboo content. That context cannot be ignored. Guardrails must align with the world the AI inhabits, while still protecting users from harm.
Low latency is essential for real-time engagement. However, safety layers like moderation systems, system prompts, and behavior evaluators can introduce delays.
The answer is not to choose one over the other. Instead, build a layered system that delivers both speed and safety. Use fast filters for initial screening and follow up with deeper checks when needed. Canned responses should allow the system to exit harmful conversations while staying in character and preserving immersion.
Too many safety layers can backfire. Filters that block harmless input or misinterpret intent frustrate users and flatten the companion’s personality.
Temperature settings, which control how creative or constrained a model is, must be carefully tuned and locked by developers. The goal is not maximum restriction or freedom, but calibrated flexibility that stays within safe bounds.
Every additional filter can add latency. Teams should benchmark for both accuracy and responsiveness, especially in fast-paced multiplayer settings.
Testing does not end at deployment. Every model update, character expansion, or new use case should be reevaluated. Testing should include edge cases, adversarial prompts, and atypical user behavior.
A mature safety strategy is guided by a clear risk appetite. What behavior is tolerable in this specific world? What crosses the line? Answering these questions helps teams make consistent decisions and avoid overengineering for outdated risks.
Robust safety depends on observability. It is not enough to monitor the model. Teams must also watch how people engage with it. Who is attempting to manipulate it? What unexpected behaviors emerge in the wild?
Long-term telemetry data can surface trends that static evaluations miss. These insights help refine safety protocols, improve escalation paths, and guide behavioral tuning. Observability is how systems evolve from reactive patches to proactive protection.
AI companions are not just products. They are characters, storytellers, and emotional touchpoints. They help players build worlds, form relationships, and immerse themselves in experiences that feel real. That is what makes safety so critical and so creative.
Safety in this context is not a layer to add at the end. It is a narrative design decision. It shapes how characters speak, react, and disengage. It determines which boundaries can be explored and which should never be crossed. And it ensures users feel protected without breaking immersion.
Done right, safety becomes part of the story. It is subtle, responsive, and believable. It does not interrupt. It guides. It enables AI characters to stay true to themselves while remaining secure.
As GenAI continues to reshape entertainment, creators have an opportunity and a responsibility to embed safety into the very DNA of their experiences. This is the next creative challenge. And it is one that will define whether AI companions become a lasting source of joy or a risk we failed to contain.
Your Guide to Deploying Safe AI Companions.