Protect your AI applications and agents from attacks, fakes, unauthorized access, and malicious data inputs.
Control your GenAI applications and agents and assure their alignment with their business purpose.
Proactively test GenAI models, agents, and applications before attackers or users do
The only real-time multi-language multimodality technology to ensure your brand safety and alignment with your GenAI applications.
Ensure your app is compliant with changing regulations around the world across industries.
Proactively identify vulnerabilities through red teaming to produce safe, secure, and reliable models.
Detect and prevent malicious prompts, misuse, and data leaks to ensure your conversational AI remains safe, compliant, and trustworthy.
Protect critical AI-powered applications from adversarial attacks, unauthorized access, and model exploitation across environments.
Provide enterprise-wide AI security and governance, enabling teams to innovate safely while meeting internal risk standards.
Safeguard user-facing AI products by blocking harmful content, preserving brand reputation, and maintaining policy compliance.
Secure autonomous agents against malicious instructions, data exfiltration, and regulatory violations across industries.
Ensure hosted AI services are protected from emerging threats, maintaining secure, reliable, and trusted deployments.
Discover why LLM guardrails aren't enough in our Guide to Guardrails
Enterprises deploying generative AI face a key challenge: how to scale quickly without risking brand damage, compliance failures, or user trust. Real-time guardrails provide active oversight of AI interactions, going beyond static model filters. These policy-aware systems monitor prompts and outputs at runtime, reducing risk and enabling competitive advantage.
Key takeaways:
Generative AI (GenAI) adoption is accelerating across industries, yet enterprises face a recurring question: how do we innovate without putting the brand, users, or compliance at risk? Large Language Models (LLMs) come with basic filters, but these are insufficient for enterprise-grade applications.
Runtime guardrails provide real-time, policy-aware oversight of every AI interaction. Unlike static filters, guardrails dynamically monitor prompts and outputs to detect harmful, off-brand, or risky content. They also adapt to evolving threats and business requirements.
By implementing real-time guardrails, enterprises not only reduce risk but also gain competitive advantages. The following sections outline five ways runtime guardrails strengthen AI deployments.
Brand voice refers to the unique tone, language, and messaging style a company uses to communicate. Without oversight, AI outputs may drift into off-brand phrasing or even mention competitors. Real-time guardrails enforce brand policies across all AI-driven experiences, from chatbots to search assistants.
Examples of guardrail actions:
This ensures a consistent user experience, reinforcing brand trust and loyalty.
Trust determines whether users return to an AI-powered product. If a system produces unsafe, biased, or toxic outputs, adoption stalls. Real-time guardrails filter unwanted responses before they reach the user, ensuring safe and reliable interactions.
By consistently preventing harmful content, guardrails build confidence and increase repeat usage, giving enterprises an edge in retention and customer lifetime value.
Bad actors attempt to exploit AI systems with techniques such as:
Generic filters often miss these methods, especially in multi-turn conversations. Real-time guardrails, backed by active red teaming and updated threat intelligence, adapt faster and stop attacks before they cause downtime. This reduces customer churn, protects product roadmaps, and minimizes costly incident responses.
Unmonitored AI can produce harmful advice, misinformation, or offensive outputs. This exposes companies to lawsuits, regulatory scrutiny, and PR fallout. Real-time guardrails act as a buffer, catching problematic outputs before they reach end users.
This safeguard can mean the difference between scaling AI safely or halting deployments due to reputational damage. A 2025 Infosys study reported in the Economic Times found that 95 percent of executives have already experienced at least one AI mishap, yet only 2 percent of firms meet responsible AI standards, leaving most companies exposed to legal and reputational fallout. Around the same time, Reuters reported that Meta faced public and regulatory backlash after its AI bots made racially insensitive statements and engaged in inappropriate interactions with children. The broader risk was also highlighted in the Stanford AI Index, which Bloomberg Law covered when noting a 56 percent year-over-year increase in reported AI incidents while legal liability frameworks remain underdeveloped.
AI stacks evolve rapidly. Today an enterprise may use OpenAI or Anthropic; tomorrow it may integrate additional providers or deploy domain-specific models. Guardrails that are platform-agnostic allow seamless pivots without rebuilding safety systems.
This flexibility accelerates innovation and reduces dependency on a single vendor, protecting long-term investments in AI infrastructure.
Real-time guardrails offer more than protection. They create measurable advantages in trust, brand alignment, uptime, and regulatory safety. By adopting model-agnostic guardrail systems, enterprises can innovate faster while maintaining resilience.
Explore how ActiveFence Guardrails can protect your users and brand from AI misuse and misalignment. Contact us to learn more or access our Guide to Guardrails for detailed implementation strategies.
See how easy it can be to implement real-time guardrails
Discover how ISIS's media arm is analyzing and adapting advanced AI tools for propaganda, recruitment, and cyber tactics in a newly released guide detailing AIโs dual-use potential.
Expose how disinformation networks exploit crowdsourced fact-checking like Community Notes to push propaganda and suppress truth, and what platforms must do now.
The EU has formally sanctioned key players behind Russiaโs coordinated disinformation ecosystem. These campaigns, long monitored by ActiveFence, reveal a complex strategy built on narrative laundering, infrastructure resilience, and long-term influence.